If you have to ask such a question, it just means you don't know anything about the Islamic Republic of Iran. Even Obama said in the debate that he would do everything in his power to prevent Iran from getting nukes (and he even said he wouldn't take military options off the table). So the real question is: why is man02raider so uninformed that he would have to ask such a silly question?

..."vigorous activists." You are also in favor of people bombing polling places on the date of the election in precincts that heavily support the candidate they are against. So, when you go to cast your ignorant, slack-jawed, mouth-breathing vote for Obama, if you are ripped in two by a bomb, it's all fine because it's probably just some McCain supporters engaging in "vigorous activism" related to a controversial issue. And one more thing: YOU ARE A TWAT.

No, fuck you, skank. And you WISH I judged you on your atrocious spelling (you even spelled "typo" incorrectly!). I judge you for being an ignorant moral relativist that defines "activism" with bombing buildings and killing innocent people. You support the bombing of abortion clinics since you're the one who claimed activism = direct vigorous action related to a controversial issue. You also clearly support the bombing of black churches by the KKK. Based on your definition they're just...

I'll comment on socialism the day YOU LEARN TO SPELL IT, retard.

Wrong, dim-wit. "Their" is possessive, as in "their government" (versus your version: "there gonvernment"). Before you start that basic "grammer" course, susanBhappy (you REALLY need it), I suggest you LEARN HOW TO SPELL GRAMMAR, you ignorant twat! And I'm sorry about the "activist" gaffe. My mistake. I had no idea "vigorous" is defined as building bombs and killing police officers. Yeah, that Weather Underground sure was "vigorous" in their activism. One more thing: GO FUCK YOURSELF.