This is one of the best and moving videos I have seen on youtube recently, and I am repost
This is one of the best and moving videos I have seen on youtube recently, and I am reposting it because it should get a much bigger audience.
Hundreds of Billions of Dollars have been wasted and spent on destruction, pain and suffering. This clearly is the best way to spend money, ISN'T IT???
Yes, it's a great way to spend money! Like President George W. Bush said rightly in 2002:
"I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace."
So all this money have been spent on PEACE, not war. I hope the everyone of those cowardish/liberal/godless people out there got the message!
So shut up and give the war more funding, because it's all about peace! Which country can we bomb next? We really need to spread more peace.
DOWNLOAD THIS CLIP HERE:
http://www.mydatabus.com/public/ufos_are_real/TheCostofWar.w mv
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 7 meses
Reproducciones: 5625
George W. Bush planned the Iraq war from the first National Security Council meeting on, l
George W. Bush planned the Iraq war from the first National Security Council meeting on, long before the 9/11 attacks took place. This was revealed by Paul O'Neill, former Treasury Secretary under George W. Bush in his book "The Price of Loyalty". Although this story was already published in 2004, it got only little attention, although it is clearly very important. This clip features excerpts of the interview that "60 minutes" conducted with Paul O'Neill. Take it from an insider: George W. Bush wanted to attack Iraq all along, and 9/11 just gave him the right excuse. It's that simple. The following generations will have to live with the terrible consequences of these reckless actions.
From Wikipedia:
The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill, a 2004 book, described the Bush administration during Paul O'Neill's tenure as Secretary of the Treasury.
Written by former Wall Street Journal reporter Ron Suskind, the book says Bush's economic policies were irresponsible, Bush was unquestioning and uncurious, and the war in Iraq was planned from the first National Security Council meeting, soon after the administration took office.
The book was based on extensive interviews with O'Neill and numerous documents O'Neill received during his job as Treasury Secretary.
About Paul O'Neill:
He began his public service as a computer systems analyst with the Veterans Administration, where he served from 1961 to 1966. He joined the United States Office of Management and Budget in 1967, and was deputy director of OMB from 1974 to 1977. After President Gerald Ford lost the 1976 election, O'Neill took an executive job at the International Paper Company in New York City. He was vice president of the company from 1977 to 1985 and president from 1985 to 1987.
In 1988, he was approached by President George H. W. Bush to be Secretary of Defense. O'Neill declined, but recommended Dick Cheney for the position. Bush then pursued O'Neill to chair an advisory group on education that included Lamar Alexander, Bill Brock, and Richard Riley. Under O'Neill's leadership, the group recommended national standards and unified testing standards.
O'Neill was chairman and CEO of the Pittsburgh industrial giant Alcoa from 1987 to 1999, and retired as chairman at the end of 2000. His reign was extremely successful, as the company's revenues increased from $1.5 billion in 1987 to $23 billion in 2000 and O'Neill's personal fortune grew to $60 million.
In 1995, O'Neill was made chairman of the RAND Corporation.
O'Neill was appointed Secretary of the Treasury by George W. Bush. O'Neill was a somewhat outspoken member of the administration, often saying things to the press that went against the administration's party line, and doing unusual things like taking a tour of Africa with singer Bono.
His book claims that the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq was not a reaction to the attacks of September 11, but was instead a campaign in the planning stages ever since Bush took office, with potential oil spoils charted in early documents.
Rather than denying his allegations, Bush officials attacked O'Neill's credibility, while answering that regime change in Iraq had been official U.S. policy since 1998, three years before Bush took office. However, O'Neill's claims called into question the relationship of the Iraq occupation to the post-9/11 War on Terrorism.
After documents containing classified information were shown during a 60 Minutes interview in which O'Neill promoted the book, a Department of Treasury investigation concluded in 2004 that no laws were violated, but that inadequate document handling policies at Treasury had allowed 140 documents, which should have been marked classified, to be entered into a computer system for unclassified documents. The documents were amongst those subsequently released to O'Neill in response to a legal document request.
Further links:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/10/oneill.bush/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3387941.stm
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB214/index.htm
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/01/11/bush_b egan_iraq_plan_pre_911_oneill_says/
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 7 meses
Reproducciones: 6379
I know, Donald Rumsfeld is "old news", but it's still funny! Or not funny. Depends how you
I know, Donald Rumsfeld is "old news", but it's still funny! Or not funny. Depends how you look at it.
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 7 meses
Reproducciones: 1227
|
This bill has to be stopped, or the expreession of freedom in the USA will go right down t
This bill has to be stopped, or the expreession of freedom in the USA will go right down the toilet!
Read those articles from Huffington Post and CNET.com:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/philip-giraldi/the-violent-rad icalizatio_b_74091.html
http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9825287-38.html?tag=nefd.to p
+++
If you haven't heard about this bill yet (H.R. 1955, titled the "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007"), it's about time. For a general explanation, see those videos:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=GylkGRh6_DQ&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=m9fyZ62U8fc&feature=related
This bill is directed at YOU. It wants YOU to SHUT UP and let the government and the established parties do whatever they want to do.
Homegrown terrorism in the USA??? WHERE??? Where are those nasty Al-Quaida cells? Where are they hiding?
What is going on here? A handful of terrorists, mainly from Saudi-Arabia, have committed a terrorist act, and now the whole US-population are potential terrorist suspects? How surreal is that? The parallels to the famous "Reichstagsbrand" in Berlin 1933 are obvious - a handful of "communists" apparently set the German Parliament on fire, on that gave Hitler the justification to pass the laws to gain control power.
And one aspect of this bill should be highlighted: It is especially directed against internet freedom. See what the brilliant US-lawmakers in this bill have to say about the Internet:
"The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization,
ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the
United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of
terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens."
GREAT - can only take a while until the great firewall of China is coming to the USA. But maybe it's more likely that a climate of self-censorship is being established, because this bill is so incredibly vague (typical method of dictatorships), so that anybody who publishes a critical video or a critical blog could be labelled a terrorist.
And the scariest thing is that this is a Democrat-sponsored bill - in the House only 6 members voted against this bill. Among the dissenters was Dennis Kucinich!!
More links:
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=4682
http://denver.craigslist.org/pol/460466760.html
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.true-crime/browse_thread/ thread/b690c5bcb3df66f4/940fd53094f79d14
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 7 meses
Reproducciones: 3604
Look how irritated George W. Bush gets when he is asked critical questions. Critically que
Look how irritated George W. Bush gets when he is asked critical questions. Critically questioning the King! And then interrupting him! Shouldn't this become a crime? I think another bill is in order here.
There have been critical interviews before with George W. Bush, conducted by US-journalists, and these are the type of interviews we want to see more often on US-television. But still, journalists from outside the US seem to be much more willing to critically question US-officials - see Jeremy Paxman's BBC-interview with John Bolton here, it's worth it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZCb45xgF44
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 7 meses
Reproducciones: 1033
Let's get away from the Bush jokes for a moment. They are just a distraction from the real
Let's get away from the Bush jokes for a moment. They are just a distraction from the real Neocon agenda, and the danger the Neocons pose to the world.
This interview shows that it is absolutely enough to questions the Neocons in a "mild" critical way, and they will immediately discgrace themselves with a truly embarassing performance.
So where are those interviews in the US-media? It would be the easiest thing in the world to expose those ignorant Neocons.
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 7 meses
Reproducciones: 2642
|
If you haven't heard about this bill yet (H.R. 1955, titled the "Violent Radicalization an
If you haven't heard about this bill yet (H.R. 1955, titled the "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007"), it's about time.
+++UDPATE+++
The Bill is now in the US Senate (Senate Bill 1959).
Link:
http://www.newstarget.com/022308.html
+++
For a general explanation, see those links and videos:
http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9825287-38.html?tag=nefd.to p
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/philip-giraldi/the-violent-rad icalizatio_b_74091.html
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kathryn__071128_urge nt_3a_help_to_topp.htm
http://youtube.com/watch?v=GylkGRh6_DQ&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=m9fyZ62U8fc&feature=related
This bill is directed at YOU. It wants YOU to SHUT UP and let the government and the established parties do whatever they want to do.
Homegrown terrorism in the USA??? WHERE??? Where are those nasty Al-Quaida cells? Where are they hiding?
What is going on here? A handful of terrorists, mainly from Saudi-Arabia, have committed a terrorist act, and now the whole US-population are potential terrorist suspects? How surreal is that? The parallels to the famous "Reichstagsbrand" in Berlin 1933 are obvious - a handful of "communists" apparently set the German Parliament on fire, on that gave Hitler the justification to pass the laws to gain control power.
And one aspect of this bill should be highlighted: It is especially directed against internet freedom. See what the brilliant US-lawmakers have to say about the Internet:
"The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization,
ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the
United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of
terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens."
GREAT - can only take a while until the great firewall of China is coming to the USA. But maybe it's more likely that a climate of self-censorship is being established, because this bill is so incredibly vague (typical method of dictatorships), so that anybody who publishes a critical video or a critical blog could be labelled a terrorist.
And the scariest thing is that this is a Democrat-sponsored bill - in the House only 6 members voted against this bill. Amongst the dissenters was Dennis Kucinich!!
More links:
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=4682
http://denver.craigslist.org/pol/460466760.html
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.true-crime/browse_thread/ thread/b690c5bcb3df66f4/940fd53094f79d14
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 7 meses
Reproducciones: 3628
FOR THE COMPLETE CLIP, GO TO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o
+++
WM
FOR THE COMPLETE CLIP, GO TO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o
+++
WMD LIES: SHORT VERSION WITHOUT SWEARWORDS.
This only reason for creating this shorter clip was, on special request, to create a version without swearwords which can be posted in forums where swearwords are not allowed.
+++
Original video created by Billy Vegas from
http://www.puppetgov.com
+++
Give the conservatives hell in their own forums!! Post this clip in all "mainstream" forums you can find!! Spread the message!
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 9 meses
Reproducciones: 1115
I am reposted this clip because it deserves a much bigger audience.
Originally created
I am reposted this clip because it deserves a much bigger audience.
Originally created by granako.
Starting in 1965, King began to express doubts about the United States' role in the Vietnam War. In an April 4, 1967, appearance at the New York City Riverside Church — exactly one year before his death — King delivered Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence. In the speech he spoke strongly against the U.S.'s role in the war, insisting that the U.S. was in Vietnam "to occupy it as an American colony" and calling the U.S. government "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today."
"Now, it should be incandescently clear that no one who has any concern for the integrity and life of America today can ignore the present war. If America's soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. It can never be saved so long as it destroys the deepest hopes of men the world over. So it is that those of us who are yet determined that America will be are led down the path of protest and dissent, working for the health of our land."
"At this point I should make it clear that while I have tried in these last few minutes to give a voice to the voiceless in Vietnam and to understand the arguments of those who are called "enemy," I am as deeply concerned about our own troops there as anything else. For it occurs to me that what we are submitting them to in Vietnam is not simply the brutalizing process that goes on in any war where armies face each other and seek to destroy. We are adding cynicism to the process of death, for they must know after a short period there that none of the things we claim to be fighting for are really involved. Before long they must know that their government has sent them into a struggle among Vietnamese, and the more sophisticated surely realize that we are on the side of the wealthy, and the secure, while we create a hell for the poor."
Martin Luther King, Jr. (January 15, 1929 -- April 4, 1968), was one of the main leaders of the American civil rights movement. A Baptist minister by training, King became a civil rights activist early in his career, leading the Montgomery Bus Boycott and helping to found the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. His efforts led to the 1963 March on Washington, where King delivered his "I Have a Dream" speech, raising public consciousness of the civil rights movement and establishing King as one of the greatest orators in American history. In 1964, King became the youngest person to receive the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to end segregation and racial discrimination through civil disobedience and other non-violent means.
Dr. King was assassinated on April 4, 1968, in Memphis, Tennessee. He was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Jimmy Carter in 1977. Martin Luther King Day was established as a national holiday in the United States in 1986. In 2004, King was posthumously awarded a Congressional Gold Medal.
(más)
(menos)
Añadido: hace 9 meses
Reproducciones: 15488
|
|
Ver los 37 vídeos
|
