|
|
|
Añadido: hace 4 días
Reproducciones: 149 |
Añadido: hace 4 días
Reproducciones: 138 |
Añadido: hace 2 semanas
Reproducciones: 418 |
|
Añadido: hace 3 semanas
Reproducciones: 285 |
Añadido: hace 3 semanas
Reproducciones: 556 |
Añadido: hace 1 mes
Reproducciones: 887 |
|
Añadido: hace 1 mes
Reproducciones: 505 |
Añadido: hace 2 meses
Reproducciones: 823 |
Añadido: hace 2 meses
Reproducciones: 1627 |
| Ver los 92 vídeos | ||
Suscriptores (206)
|
|
Amigos (22)
|
|
Comentarios sobre el canal (110)
|
great channel........keep up the great work and don't let the duffus'es get you down LOL.........We all know what happened.......The Conspiracy........is no longer a "theory"
If people think it is a theory after all that Bush has done in the past year or two with the Patriot Act and passing all of those laws.........well, they need a frontal labotomy. There is a grand agenda that began with his grandfather Prescott Bush and the Nazi party. |
||
|
Thank you. The time will come.
|
||
|
thank you for uploading those videos
|
||
|
And the damage noticed to the lobby in the Naudet film? And, you claim that this 800 ft smoke plume was caused by ONE small car fire? Plane wreckage? Does that actually seem logical to you? The basement bombs (demo charges) don't cause the top down collapse. They take out the basement so the building could fall there. ???? You claim that every explosion heard by witnesses is due to ppl jumping? That is the most ridiculous thing I have heard yet. And, what about the ppl that were actually thrown or injured by these explosions. Google Felipe David for one. The smoke in the subway? Enter logic. Would the ppl in the upper floors hear this? Nope. It was heard in the Naudet flim because they were in the lobby. Hello? Use your head.
|
||
|
So you decline to explain the miraculous 'floating cutter charge smoke'? Also please explain why you baselessly claim debunkers do not discuss basement bombs. Don't forget that the bottom part of the core survived collapse, which is hardly evidence of a controlled demoltion (We also have that nagging fact that the Towers fell top-down, don't we?). Also, Willy Rodriquez didn't even mention explosions in his lawsuit against the Bush Administration (which can't be blamed on wanting to stick with the 'things he could prove' because what he did include got him laughed out of court).
But I must remember, in the game of Truth, if every single anamoly is not explained a hundred times over it's proof of a conspiracy. |
||
|
I would compare the sound of the building collapsing to an explosion as well.
Re: smoke plume going 800 ft. upwards- Hahaha, smoke from explosive charges go 800 ft. into the air? Clinging to this bit (Well, almost every bit) of minutae shows the strength of the Truth Movement. Again, care to explain how basement bombs cause a top-down collapse? Avoiding this shows your critical thinking ability. |
||
|
The Naudet footage also lacks distinctive sounds of detonating cutter charges.
|
||
|
Armchair:
Finish the reporters quote: "This is as close as we get to the base of the World Trade Center....a huge EXPLOSION now raining debris on all of us.." Yes, he said "Explosion" and he was right there. Was he the very first CT of 911? youtube[dot]com/watch?v=FgMq_SDXLdI |
||
|
You talk about footage near the WTC Towers pre-collapse with JLaw, and asked for five videos with sounds of the collapse.
I can think of three quickly: The unaltered audio here: /watch?v=s6x07FKJZFw The footage of the FOX (?) reporter stating 'this is as close as we could get to the base of the WTC', as well as (I believe) a video near Trinity Church had audio as well. |
||
|
Okay, I see your 'flash witnesses' and raise you:
'Accounts of structural instability in the Twin Towers, Bowing of columns, Collapse expected' 911stories dot googlepages dot com/accountsoftowerstructuralinstabilityande Which includes my favorite passage about DeMartini, take a look. |
||





















