you are an idiot

"God could have planted the first cell and let it evolve..."

Except that is a complete contradiction of what the Genesis says, and seeing as Jesus an nearly every other book in the Bible quotes Genesis, I'd say that that theory is not valid.

(my below comment was a response to Terrencje)

You realize that in the studies that have been conducted to attempt to make living matter from non-living matter have all had the oxygen in the cycle taken out, ("...in an oxygen-less atmosphere..." - Bill Bryson,(2003) A Short History of Nearly Everything). And unless the atmosphere in those times were without carbon dioxide or water vapor oxygen was present within those substances
If the oxygen had been in the experiment, it would have blown up, leaving no chance for life at all. That and the energy needed to drive the reactions forward is more likely to break them apart (especially in complex molecules that would quickly break down to simple compounds), you see, they knew this, so they intervened with a trap to catch the organic compounds before they were exposed to the energy, which is not what nature would have done.

i think kent hovind is a great comedian, the stuff he says is soooo stupid is funny.

but sometimes the stuff he says is so stupid that is jaw dropping.

But can I ask a few questions btw?
Why do the predictions of evolution on Biogeography get fullfilled?
Why do predictions in the fossilrecord get fullfilled? (As examples: tiktaalik and the whaleintermediate fossils).

Why do so much ERV's and transposons are exactly the same in humans and chimpansees when they are stricktly random?
Why do chicken have pseudogenes for eggs?
Why do whales have pseudogenes for legs?
Why do all mammals (including us) have pseudogenes for eggs?

How does creationism explains endosymbiosis?

Can you provide links or explanations?

"And regarding talk origins, Kent Hovind has a video that responds to talk origins and and explains things to them. I'm not sure if it's on youtube though. Although I mostly think that AiG is good, I don't think they should be telling people not to use certain arguments just because some "know it all atheist" tells them not. And Kent Hovind adresses AiG pretty well in one of his seminars."

Actually AiG acknowledges that some of the creationists arguments mainly from Walt Brown and Kent Hovind are just plain wrong, rebuttal of kent hovind is to find everywhere on the internet. Why would kent hovind use an argument when it is false? I don't know. Neither does AiG I think but at least they are honest...

"What makes the rib woman more reasonable is that the rib woman is life coming from organic substances rather than rocks."

No because we almost fully know how life can arise from nonliving matter. Also Adam had to be made from non living matter. And god always exsisted because the universe is soo complex that it needs a creator. But we don't even know if the universe was created or that it always excisted...So why would a complex universe that may have always excisted had to be build by something more complex that didn't require a creator?

"For your information, it is a scientific fact that life cannot come from nonliving matter (and just because someone can create a few amino acids in a lab doesn't mean that we all came from rocks)."

It is NOT a scientific fact that life cannot come from nonliving matter.
You really need to study Abiogenesis if you want to comment this. They are already way ahead of what you think and they are getting closer every day.

"Genetics say that only change within a kinds of animals can happen."

NO, genetics shows we had a common ancestor with chimpansees.
Evidence is the Cytochrome C, ERV's, transposons etc.

"It's true that evolution has nothing to do with the beginning of life, however, you cannot say that we were not created by God without proving that life can start without God."

Actually we can explain how Gravity works without a god but still it doesn't require how gravity is made without a god to state that gravity doesn't work with the help of god now. God could have planted the first cell and let it evolve...